[Xprint] Re: Suggested Xprint DDX reorg

[Drew Parsons]

On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 19:28 +0100, Julien Lafon wrote:
> On 1/5/06, Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> wrote:
> >
> > For parallelism I'd rather see the Xprint DDX moved under hw and its config
> > bits under that:
> >
> > Does anyone have a compelling case against this?
> > If not I'll probably shuffle
> > this around sometime this weekend.
> 
> It does not sound not logical to me - Xprint DDX is no physical
> hardware so why should it be tagged as such?
> 

Maybe "hw" could be renamed to "ddx"?

That'd parallelise against the existing dix directory.

Drew

(I don't have strong opinions either way, so long as I don't have to
redo the Xprint patch I just submitted :) )